
There are dozens of AI meeting note tools today, from big international names to new Czech projects. But the differences between them are huge. Here are five questions to ask before you trust one with your meetings.
This is question number one. Most international tools are trained primarily on English; they “sort of” handle Czech, but fall apart on slang, names and technical terms. Look for a tool built for Czech and Slovak, and test it on a real meeting with everything that comes with it: fast speech, people talking over each other, technical terms.
A raw transcript is only half the job, a long block of text you still have to dig through. A good tool turns it into structure: a summary, decisions, tasks with deadlines (who, what, by when), a follow-up email. This layer is what decides how much time the tool actually saves you.
Watch the fine print: file size limits (20 MB may not be enough even for an hour-long recording), limits on live recording length, number of meetings per month. Ideally you pay for the time actually processed and do not have to worry about anything else.
Sensitive things come up in meetings: prices, strategy, personal data. Make sure recordings and transcripts stay encrypted in the EU and the tool is GDPR compliant. With free tools, always ask how you are paying; often it is with your data.
A serious tool lets you try everything on your own meetings free for 5 days. If someone wants your payment details before you have seen the first output, be on your guard.
The best test is always the same: take your last real meeting, run it through the tool and see whether you would confidently send the output to a client.
We built ZAPSIO around exactly these five points: top-quality Czech, a finished meeting record instead of a block of text, no file size limits, data encrypted in the EU, and 5 days free, cancel anytime.
5 days free, and you will see the output from a real meeting within minutes.
Try ZAPSIO free